AI and human and my research..

The structure of Artificial Intelligence paper(thesis) : I used this to automate this work (describe the algorithmㅡmethod), I did this, I did this, I did this...

It's all the same format.

I wonder if I can read them as an object of my thought instead of just reading and writing only to graduate, get the master's degree.(Hopefully, the topic can be applied in practice, but what does he mean by humanity?

It burdens me because of the co-worker is very authority man who are working as doctor, professor of National Hospital. 

Is this research really have some meaning to human life?

Burden of authority. I really want to recognize by authority. I really want to have authority.

In the papers, the significance of "What this research signify for human life?" is roughly described, but (in fact, it is mostly written for filler rather than thinking about the actual significance of this research...)

So, most of the significance part is lightly passed, and only the methodology is read hard, and the engineering paper is read...

There is no paper that sells the "significance" of this technology in detail, and if you sell such a thing hard, it will eventually become a humanities paper, not an engineering paper.

Graduate students in science and engineering who study artificial intelligence are busy understanding the mathematical logic of algorithms and applying what they understand to projects (assignments).

It is not easy to think about it as an object of "thinking". Of course, there is so much to "understand" and study. I can't think because there is a lot of knowledge to acquire, a lot to understand and apply.

The speed of development is also fast, so if I study this, something new will come out again. Need to follow up forever. Always need to learn something that is SOTA (state of art) and high performance...;3;

Always updating something contemporary (always building something new in the West), so you don't have time to look back at past technologies, the flow of things.

As a result of living an overly machine-oriented life, reflections on the relationship between us as humans and our mettle, and the link between mettle and human life, are lost.

Therefore, it is true that the "reasoning" based on Korean science and humanity is useless in most cases. Except for a few who have mastered all the existing science knowledge and can incorporate their humanistic thoughts into a science thesis and prove it with mathematical logic.

You don't think because you don't have time or need to.

Because thinking is not a tangible output (machine, program, faster speed, etc..).

Haha.

Rather, people in the humanities/arts seriously think about AI. They don't have the details of knowledge, but they think about problems from a human perspective.

This is because these people are used to criticizing and thinking from a "human" perspective, while science people are used to learning/studying about non-humans/machines, etc. without any metacognitive critical consciousness.

(Of course, not all of them are like that, but it's still better than science people)

The thought of artificial intelligence of literary and artistic people leads me to study.

It's a great way to get a better understanding of the world around you, and it's a great way to get a better understanding of the world around you.

A philosophy that can change the entirety of human life. It can change the way we exist. Just like all the revolutionary technologies in human history that have changed the way we live. Something that could have a huge impact on society as a whole.

That's what I'm studying '▽'!

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)